Legal Opinion
State of California v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1968No. 21291_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
The United States initiated proceedings to condemn certain lands in the City and County of San Francisco for the expansion of San Francisco Naval Shipyard. The State of California claimed title to part of the lands and sought compensation for their loss. The district court awarded nominal damages. The State appealed.
It is stipulated that all of the condemned lands, including those claimed by the State, were tide or submerged lands which passed to the State upon its admission to the Union in 1850. 1 In 1868 the State authorized the survey and division of the lands into…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. 8.929 Acres of Land in Arlington County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Standard Oil Company of California v. Arizona, California, Florida, Oregon, and WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN PROPERTY of BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN, CITY, COUNTY & NEW YORKCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In re the Valuation Proceedings under Sections 303(c) & 306Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.