Legal Opinion

Hormel v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 27, 2010No. 1 CA-TX 07-0008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINTHROP, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal from denial of special action relief arises out of an attempt by George A. Hormel II and Jamie R. Hormel, trustees of the George A. Hormel II Trust (“Taxpayer” or “the Trust”) to enforce the payment of refunds based on reclassification of property known as the Wrigley Mansion (“the Property”) during tax years 2001, 2002, and 2003 pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 42-16254 (Supp.2009), 1 the property tax error correction statute. Mari-copa County (“the County”) opposes the payment of the refunds, arguing that any…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. City of Phoenix v. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. SolarCity Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Jacob E. Wideman v. Adoc and Arizona Board of Executive ClemencyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
  4. Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API