In re MH 2005-001290
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the trial court violated Appellant’s right to due process by ordering that two of his family members be given notice prior to his release from a mental health treatment facility. We find no error and affirm the trial court’s order.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 A petition for involuntary court-ordered mental health evaluation was filed on August 16, 2005. It alleged that Appellant threatened to kill himself and his sister, Renee R.; threatened to harm his older daughter, Michelle W.; and told his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Slade v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Langmade v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re MH 2008-000028Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In re MH 2009-001264Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- In Re Mh 2008-002393Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In Re Mh-2008-000867Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.