Legal Opinion

Miller v. Frasure

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1994No. 93-253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal, and a cross-appeal, from a Workers’ Compensation Court, findings of fact, conclusions of law and order, in which the court ruled that petitioner Linda Newman Miller (Miller), was permanently partially disabled. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for calculation of the permanent partial disability rate.

We restate the issues on appeal and cross-appeal.

ISSUES ON APPEAL

1. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in concluding that Miller was not permanently totally disabled?

2. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err during its in camera inspection of the insurer’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Palmer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Massman v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ArlingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Thompson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kloepfer v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. AndersenMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kloepfer v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API