Legal Opinion

Kloepfer v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1996No. 95-437Published

1Opinion of the Court

916 P.2d 1310 (1996)

Victoria KLOEPFER, Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent and Insurer for Bechtel Construction Company, Employer and Respondent.

No. 95-437.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs April 25, 1996.

Decided May 20, 1996.

James G. Edmiston, III, Edmiston Law Firm, Billings, for Appellant.

Steven S. Carey, Carey, Meismer & McKeon, Missoula, for Respondent.

ERDMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the Workers' Compensation Court judgment denying Victoria Kloepfer permanent total disability benefits. We affirm.

The issue presented for review is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metzger v. Chemetron Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gaumer v. Montana Department of HighwaysMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Kloepfer v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Miller v. FrasureMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Pepion v. Blackfeet Tribal IndustriesMontana Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API