Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Andersen

¶1 Niel Andersen (Andersen) appeals from the judgment entered by the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, on a jury verdict in favor of The Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers). We affirm.

¶2 Andersen raises the following issues:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in denying Andersen’s motion for summary judgment asserting that Travelers’ cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations?

¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in excluding expert witness testimony?

¶5 3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in excluding a report prepared by a deputy…