Legal Opinion

State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Ovitz

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1994No. 21333PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

Defendants-Appellants, David Ovitz and Jack Ovitz (the “Ovitzes”), appeal from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), and denying the Ovitzes’ cross-motion for summary judgment. We address one issue on appeal: Whether the trial court erred when it concluded that the Ovitzes were not entitled to uninsured motorist benefits under their State Farm automobile liability insurance policy. We review this case pursuant to SCRA 1986, 12-102(A)(1) (Repl. Pamp.1992), and affirm.

I

This…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Romero v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kurent v. Farmers Insurance of Columbus, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. BensonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Blais v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. Crossley v. Pacific Employers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ballard Ex Rel. BallardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Boradiansky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Shope v. State Farm InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dominguez v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API