Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ballard Ex Rel. Ballard

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2002No. 27,252PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Chief Justice.

{1} This case involves a single vehicle accident that occurred within New Mexico. Plaintiff State Farm Insurance Company-seeks a declaration in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico that the Georgia policy it issued to Defendant Carol Ballard limits liability coverage to $50,000. This Court accepted certification from Judge Leslie C. Smith on the question of whether

New Mexico law applies] to interpret a step down provision in a Georgia automobile liability insurance policy ... where the non-resident insureds are injured in a one-vehicle…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Estep v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Maestas v. OvertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Terrazas v. Garland & Loman, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Boradiansky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Schleuter v. Northern Plains Ins. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. WelchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API