Legal Opinion

Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1995No. 22769, 22765PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Justice.

In this consolidated appeal Dairyland Insurance Co. (Dairyland) and Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Co. (Phoenix) appeal from the trial court’s order granting declaratory relief and directing the parties to arbitrate an uninsured motorist dispute. This appeal raises an issue of first impression for New Mexico courts: whether uninsured motorist coverage extends to a victim of an intentional tort perpetrated by a passenger in an uninsured motor vehicle. We conclude that an intentional act may be an “accident” for uninsured motorist coverage purposes but that there must be…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Romero v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Wendell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wilson v. DenverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DeHaanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Barncastle v. American National Property & Casualty CompaniesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API