Legal Opinion

People v. Engquist

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1990No. C005569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

A jury convicted defendant of possession of cocaine for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.) Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on probation for three years with the condition he serve one year in the county jail. On appeal, defendant contends: 1) he was denied presentence custody credits; and 2) the court erred under rule 433(b) 1 in failing to make factual findings which would justify imposition of the upper or lower term should probation be revoked.

With respect to custody credits the record discloses that defendant was in the county jail from May…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. People v. SernaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. DuranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. SaldivarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GoodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API