Legal Opinion

People v. Saldivar

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1984No. F001837PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.

Statement of the Case

On April 30, 1982, following denial of a Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress evidence, appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of robbery. On June 17, 1982, the court “suspended] imposition of judgment and sentence” and placed appellant on five years probation. Less than a month later, appellant’s probation was revoked for failure to comply with the terms of probation.

Appellant was sent to the California Youth Authority (CYA or Youth Authority) for a diagnostic evaluation. While at CYA, appellant threatened various case workers and was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. SaffellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. TwineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RitchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. EngquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API