Legal Opinion

People v. Waterman

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1986No. Crim. 24808PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

At the People’s request, we granted review of this case as a companion to In re Huffman, ante, at page 552 [229 Cal.Rptr. 796, 724 P.2d 482]. In Huffman, we found no equal protection violation in the fact that persons committed for treatment as mentally disordered sex offenders (MDSOs), unlike addicted offenders committed to the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC), are denied “conduct” and “participation” credits while in the treatment facility which would reduce their maximum periods of confinement or incarceration. Appellant in this case makes a similar equal protection…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Conservatorship of HofferberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. SaffellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Jackson v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. LapailleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. QuirozCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API