Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

Defendant appeals from conviction of (1) armed robbery, and (2) being a habitual criminal, Chapter 22, Public Acts of 1939. Defendant’s guilt of armed robbery *66was admitted. F'or the offense the jury imposed the maximum term of imprisonment, 10 years. At the outset of the trial the Attorney General announced that the defendant was being put on trial in that character. The Clerk of the Criminal Court of Knox County testified without objection, that in addition to the admitted robbery committed in July 1948, the records of the Criminal Court of Knox County showed that defendant had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. McCorkleTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Robertson v. WinchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Reinhardt v. NealisTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Minter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marmino v. MarminoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  2. Smith v. LeedyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  3. Bomar v. State Ex Rel. StewartTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bomar v. State Ex Rel. StewartTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In re MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API