Legal Opinion

Smith v. Leedy

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 11, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

Appellants, Dorothy Leedy and Robert Thomas, have appealed from a decree of the Chancery Court of Knox County declaring void and enjoining the collection thereof, two judgments for damages obtained separately by them in the Circuit Court of said County against the appellees, L. E. Smith individually, and George T. Britton and Sue K. Britton, d/b/a Britton Motors, said decree reading, as follows:

“That the defendants Dorothy Leedy and Robert Thomas, on the 21st day of February, 1955, instituted separate civil actions for damages in the General Sessions Court for Knox County, Tennessee, against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. FloodTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Van Pelt v. P. and L. Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  3. Cantrell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Nichols v. Lebanon & Hartsville Turnpike Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Chicago, M. G.R. Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McClintockTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. CottrellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. State v. CottrellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. State v. Mark J. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API