Legal Opinion

Minter v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1921PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PROM RUTHERFORD. Error to the Circuit Court of Rutherford County. — Hon. Jno E. RICHARDSON, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The plaintiff in error, Dock Minter, was indicted in the circuit court of Rutherford county for unlawfully possessing and transporting intoxicating liquors in violation of chapter 12 of the Acts of 1917. He was tried before the court and a jury and found guilty, the jury having fixed *680Ms fine at $100; and judgment haying been rendered accordingly, he has appealed to this court and has assigned errors.

By the first error assigned it is insisted that the evidence preponderates against the verdict.

We think the evidence overwhelmingly preponderates in favor of the verdict of guilty rather than…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. YardleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Heiskell v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. House v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Tipton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Rhoton v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
  4. Taylor v. Robertson, Admr.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  5. Cantrell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API