Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Thurston

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 28, 1998No. 37749-3-IPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

Robert Thurston and Martyna Mandel, 1 former spouses, each appeal a 1995 decree that was entered following a trial that was conducted after the court partially vacated a 1989 dissolution decree. Primarily at issue are the propriety of the trial court’s partial vacation of the 1989 decree and the characterization and division of the parties’ property in the 1995 decree.

Because a material condition of the parties’ 1989 decree did not occur and the nonoccurrence of that condition constituted an extraordinary circumstance, the court did not abuse its discretion by granting the CR 60(b)(ll)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clarke v. BurkleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. State v. SantosWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Adoption of BuehlWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Raymond Washington v. Clayton PenwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of TangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Luckett v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. In Re Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Somers v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Somers v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API