Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Moody

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1999No. 66604-1PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.

This is an action to vacate the maintenance provisions of a decree of legal separation. The appellant husband asks us to hold that the couple’s reconciliation invalidated the decree and a subsequent agreed order modifying the maintenance award or, alternatively, that the decree should be vacated because it is unfair or because it violates federal law.

We affirm the trial court and Court of Appeals and hold that the reconciliation of a husband and wife does not invalidate a judicial decree of legal separation or other related orders of the court.

FACTS

Homer and Lela Moody were married August 8,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In the Matter of Marriage of TangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. In Re the Marriage of ThurstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Matter of Marriage of KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Matter of Marriage of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. RamerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of DoddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In re the Marriage of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API