Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Kinser

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 8128SC117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

This appeal presents three questions of law: (1) Is the 6 October 1975 paper, writing a contract or an option? (2) If it is an option, did Kinser fully comply with the terms of the 6 October 1975 paper writing? (3) If Kinser did not fully comply with the terms of the 6 October 1975 paper writing, was his non-compliance excused by the anticipatory breach of contract by Dixon?

The scope of appellate review in a case heard by a judge sitting without a jury is clear. The trial court’s findings of fact have the force and effect of a verdict by jury and are conclusive on appeal if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Douglass v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Millis Construction Co. v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. First Union National Bank of North Carolina v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Triad Packaging, Inc. v. SupplyOne, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
  4. Draughon v. DraughonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Carson v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API