Dixon v. Kinser
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
This appeal presents three questions of law: (1) Is the 6 October 1975 paper, writing a contract or an option? (2) If it is an option, did Kinser fully comply with the terms of the 6 October 1975 paper writing? (3) If Kinser did not fully comply with the terms of the 6 October 1975 paper writing, was his non-compliance excused by the anticipatory breach of contract by Dixon?
The scope of appellate review in a case heard by a judge sitting without a jury is clear. The trial court’s findings of fact have the force and effect of a verdict by jury and are conclusive on appeal if…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Douglass v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Millis Construction Co. v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- First Union National Bank of North Carolina v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Triad Packaging, Inc. v. SupplyOne, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Draughon v. DraughonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Carson v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.