Warner v. W & O, INCORPORATED
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The quoted findings listed by the court as facts are, in reality, legal conclusions determinative of the rights of the parties. Plaintiffs’ exceptions to the findings and their assignments of error necessitate an examination of the facts, those stipulated and found by the court, to ascertain if the quoted conclusions are correct. The listing of what is in reality a legal conclusion as a fact, when contrary to the facts stipulated and not supported by the evidence, has no efficacy.
The finding that the validity of the permit to build had been judicially determined by judgment entered by Judge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Mizell v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
- Hall v. Misenheimer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- In Re W. P. Rose Builders Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Burriss v. . StarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Application of Campsites Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.