Legal Opinion
Phone-Mate, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 17, 1988No. Court 86-11-01449PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RE, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain combination telephone and answering machine devices imported from Japan and described on the customs invoice as “other terminal equipment.”
The merchandise entered at the port of Los Angeles, California in 1986, and was classified by the Customs Service as “[tjelephone sets and other terminal equipment and parts thereof,” under item 684.58 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Consequently, the merchandise was assessed with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Phone-Mate, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- W.Y. Moberly, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- PS Chez Sidney, LLC v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.