Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Patrick Archer Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 16, 2004No. 52943-9-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, C.J.

Patrick Archer Construction (Archer) and Patrick Archer and Jane Doe Archer appeal the trial court order granting Mutual of Enumclaw’s (MOE’s) motion for summary judgment and denying their CR 56(f) motion to continue. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to continue and MOE has established that the policy exclusion for “products” under the commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy controls, we affirm.

Archer is a licensed general contractor. MOE issued to it a CGL policy with a Broad Form Extended Liability Endorsement for contractual liability…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Western National Assurance Co. v. Shelcon Construction Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Titan Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Monique Messenger v. Shannon L. WhitemarshCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Bank Of India v. Sj Consignment Venture Et AnoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Mid-Century Insurance Company v. ZancoDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API