Legal Opinion

Barnett v. United States (In Re Barnett)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 15, 1983No. 19-30363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN FLOWERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

In this chapter 13 case the Farmer’s Home Administration (“FmHA”) complains that the Debtor, Barnett, is only entitled to a statutory 100 acre rural homestead exemption from the satisfaction of its claims. Debtor argues that he is entitled to a 200 acre exemption. I agree, and hold that Barnett is entitled to claim 200 acres as his homestead. FmHA next asserts that the Debtor is entitled to a $15,000 personal property exemption that is to be calculated by using the sum of the fair market value of the exempt personalty. Barnett counters with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woods v. Alvarado State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Schulz v. L. E. Whitham & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Renaldo v. Bank of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Crow v. BurmeisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter Of: Jeani Maloy Hill, Debtor. Edmond J. Zielinski, Interim Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Jeani Maloy Hill v. Jeani Maloy HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Rouillard v. Tardiff (In Re Tardiff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1984
  3. In Re BrooksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
  4. Matter of HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. Coffman (In Re Coffman)District Court, N.D. Texas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API