Legal Opinion

Woods v. Alvarado State Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1929No. 4462PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

A clear statement of this case will be found in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 275 S. W., 187.

At the time of the divorce decree the plaintiff in error, Woods, had two minor children, who, though awarded to their mother, continued to live with him, and for the support of whom, whether living with him or not, he was at all times liable. Plainly he continued to be the head of a family, and as such entitled to all the homestead privileges and rights granted by the Constitution and laws of the State. Hall v. Fields, 81 Texas, 553, 17 S. W., 82; Speer & Goodnight v. Sykes, 102 Texas,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Stallings v. HullumTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hall v. FieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hargadene, McKittrick & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Speer & Goodnight v. SykesTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Parker v. SchrimsherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Paddock v. SiemoneitTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Laster v. First Huntsville Properties Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lifemark Corp. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API