Legal Opinion

G. D. Mathews & Sons Corp. v. MSN Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 22, 2002No. 01-P-1277PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.

MSN Corporation, doing business as Budd Foods (MSN), appeals from a Superior Court judge’s order allowing G. D. Mathews & Sons Corporation’s (Mathews’s) motion to disqualify Choate, Hall & Stewart (Choate) from acting as counsel for MSN in this action. On appeal, MSN claims that the judge’s allowance of Mathews’s motion to disqualify was improper because (1) Choate’s former representation of Mathews is not substantially related to the present litigation and (2) Mathews waived any potential challenge to Choate’s representation by failing timely to raise the conflict issue.1 We affirm the order.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Sarvis v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. Bays v. TheranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Adoption of EricaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Masiello v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Slade v. OrmsbyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Steinert v. SteinertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. R & D Muller, Ltd. v. Fontaine's Auction Gallery, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. Verizon Yellow Pages Co. v. Sims & Sims, PCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003
  5. Amaral Enterprises LLC v. GianDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API