Legal Opinion
Rieck v. Jensen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 30, 2011No. 10-4110, 10-4119PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Utah County Deputy Sheriff Scott Jensen appeals the district court’s ruling that he was not entitled to qualified immunity on claims brought against him by William Rieck alleging illegal entry, illegal detention, and excessive force. The claims arose out of an incident on Rieck’s 17-acre property in an unincorporated part of Utah County. The district court ruled that Jensen was not entitled to qualified immunity because he entered a closed gate to Rieck’s property without a warrant. On appeal Rieck has not argued any alternative ground for denying Jensen qualified…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sawyers v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Allstate Sweeping, LLC v. Calvin BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Estate of Joseph Valverde v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. CarlossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.