United States v. Carloss
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
In this direct criminal appeal, Defendant-Appellant Ralph Carloss contends that two police officers violated the Fourth Amendment by knocking on his front door, seeking to speak with him. Ordinarily a police officer, like any citizen, has an implied license to approach a home, knock on the front door, and ask to speak with the occupants. Carloss, however, claims that “No Trespassing” signs posted around the house and on the front door of his home revoked that implied license. We conclude, to the contrary, that under the circumstances presented here, those “No Trespassing”…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- French v. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. GuillenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- State of Tennessee v. James Robert Christensen, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. AlbertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.