Legal Opinion

Wittman v. Police Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1904No. S.F. No. 3015PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is a certiorari proceeding in which the trial court gave the plaintiff judgment annulling an order of defendant which directed the sheriff of the said city and county to summon forty jurors for the trial of the plaintiff on a charge of misdemeanor then regularly pending before the defendant police court. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

The writ of certiorañ, otherwise denominated the writ of review, is an extraordinary remedy, and lies only “when an inferior tribunal, board, or officer, exercising judicial functions, has exceeded the jurisdiction of such tribunal, board,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Powelson v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. In re FifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ex parte MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bennett v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Armantage v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Goodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Chapman v. Justice Court of Tonopah TownshipNevada Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hood v. MelroseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API