Armantage v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for Certiorari to review a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County rendered upon appeal from a justice’s court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.
This is an application for a writ of certiorari, otherwise called the writ of review.
The facts are, that E. B. Mutter commenced an action in the justice’s court against Armantage, the plaintiff herein. Summons was duly served on Armantage, who thereafter demurred to the complaint, and on said demurrer being overruled, answered. The case was thereafter set down for trial. The notice that the case had been set for trial was not served like a summons, as is required by section 850 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but was served by mail only. Armantage did not appear at the time fixed for trial,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valentine v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Borchard v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bullard v. McArdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Maxson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Elder v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Am. Law Book Co. v. Superior Court of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- American Bridge Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Bates v. FerrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Gunn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.