Porter v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order denying a motion to amend the complaint after trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge presiding.' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
On the fifth day of June, 1908, Porter and the respondent, Edward Anderson, became parties to a written agreement by the terms of which they mutually covenanted to exchange certain real and personal property. The real property of Anderson which was the subject of said agreement consists of lots 1 and 2, in what is known as “Gridley Colony No. 5,” in Butte county, this state, together with improvements and certain personal property, and that of Porter is situated in the state of Utah, and is described as the “S. W. % of the N. W. % of section 3, township 11 N., 3 West, Salt Lake Meridian, Box…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Henrietta v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kauffman v. De MutiisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Svistunoff v. SvistunoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Mahana v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- George v. WestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Penryn Land Co. v. AkahoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.