Penryn Land Co. v. Akahori
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from an order vacating a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title! to certain real estate. The order was made upon the ground of “the mistake and excusable neglect” of the defendant. Appellate courts are strongly inclined to uphold such an order if there be found in the record any legal justification for the action of the lower court. It is desirable, of course, to have causes tried and determined upon their merits, and, no doubt, this consideration was the determining factor with the lower trial judge herein. However, when the orderly processes of law have been followed and a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lally v. KusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Alferitz v. CahenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Estate of McDougaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Redding Gold & Copper Mining Co. v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Martin v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Bennett v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Lynch v. Arizona Enterprise Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Ross v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.