Legal Opinion

Compensation of Sandstrum v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 23, 1980No. WCB Case No. 78-9257, CA 16710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

In this workers’ compensation proceeding the issue is whether the State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) unreasonably deducted from claimant’s permanent partial disability benefits $974.01 pursuant to a wage assignment under ORS 23.777 to satisfy claimant’s child support obligation. Claimant appeals from that portion of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirming the referee’s order and ruling that SAIF did not act unreasonably in withholding the benefits, and thus that claimant was not entitled to a penalty and an attorney’s fee. We affirm.

The chronology of this case is as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norgard v. Rawlinsons & New System LaundryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Calvin v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. Jones v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Satterfield v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Zwahlen v. Crown Zellerbach Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. McIntyre v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. McIntyre v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Satterfield v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API