Legal Opinion

Satterfield v. Satterfield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1981No. 30221, CA 19757PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The sole issue involved in this appeal is whether worker’s compensation benefits due an injured worker are subject to attachment and garnishment for the benefit of the worker’s dependent children. The worker’s former wife appeals from an order by the Circuit Court dismissing garnishment proceedings brought to reach the worker’s compensation benefits due her former husband from his employer’s insurance carrier, Wausau Insurance Company (Wausau).

The sole assignment of error is the dismissal of her petition for attachment and garnishment of the above benefits. The essential facts are not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Calvin v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Compensation of Sandstrum v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Jones v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. McIntyre v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API