Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1981No. 376-325, CA 19231Published

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Respondent seeks to garnish Workers’ Compensation benefits due defendant. The trial court granted a continuing garnishment against defendant’s benefits for the lesser of 25 percent of the benefit or $255 per month. Defendant appeals. We reverse in part.

Defendant first contends that a creditor may not garnish Workers’ Compensation benefits. Defendant is incorrect. See Satterfield v. Satterfield, 54 Or App 184, 634 P2d 787 (1981).1

Defendant next contends that, assuming garnishment was permissible, a continuing garnishment was not. We agree. In Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Lynch, 268 Or 142, 502 P2d 351…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Calvin v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Scheuerman v. MathisonOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Compensation of Sandstrum v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. LynchOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Satterfield v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API