County of Sacramento v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
In this appeal from a judgment holding the state and various state officials (state) liable to the County of Sacramento (county) for the county’s unreimbursed expenditures in administering a state-mandated program of “in-home supportive services” for aged, blind and disabled persons, we are called upon to decide the state’s responsibility for funding the program. We hold that the state met its total funding obligation by exceeding the “matching” contribution required to secure federal dollars and that it was not further obligated to reimburse the county for administrative…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. CuevasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Paddock v. PaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Flewelling v. Board of Trustees of American River Junior College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by16 opinions
- In-Home Supportive Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Miller v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Perry v. Heavenly ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Marshall v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.