Legal Opinion
Perry v. Heavenly Valley
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1985No. Civ. 23704PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J. *
Plaintiff Susan Perry appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Heavenly Valley (Heavenly) in an action for negligence, entered after the trial court granted Heavenly’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends the court erred in determining an amendment to the Workers’ Compensation Act which severely limited the “dual capacity doctrine” applies retroactively to the present case. (Lab. Code, § 3602, subd. (a); Stats. 1982, ch. 922, § 6.) We agree and shall reverse the judgment.
Facts
On October 10, 1979, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging she was employed by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Russell v. OrrMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Blew v. HornerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Russell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.