Legal Opinion
Emmett Ray McCarthy v. Dr. F. Weinberg, M.D.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1985No. 84-1316PublishedCited by 396 opinions
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing, after a jury verdict for defendant, plaintiff’s action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel.
Plaintiff, Emmett Ray McCarthy, is a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walter Gordon v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Joe Martin, Warden, Wayne Stephen Young v. George H. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Martinez v. AaronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Jerome MacLin v. Dr. FreakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Leeke v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Heidelberg v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by396 opinions
- Gregory Lee Rucks v. Gary BoergermannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Miller v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Dee Farmer v. Richard Haas, Edward J. Brennan, and L.E. DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Yu Kikumura v. OsagieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.