Legal Opinion
Gregory Lee Rucks v. Gary Boergermann
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 14, 1995No. 94-5186PublishedCited by 822 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
The Plaintiff, Mr. Rucks, alleges that the Defendant, Mr. Boergermann, a Tulsa Police Officer, violated his Fourth Amendment rights during an investigation and subsequent arrest on April 21, 1991. Mr. Rucks brought a pro se civil rights action against Officer Boergermann pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in the Northern District of Oklahoma. 1 Mr. Rucks was granted in forma pauperis status and twice sought appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Both motions were denied and eventually the case went to'a jury-trial, where a verdict was returned in favor of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Emmett Ray McCarthy v. Dr. F. Weinberg, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Jerome MacLin v. Dr. FreakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Isa Abd'allah R. Shabazz v. Jari Askins Carolyn Crump Marzee Douglas Carl B. Hamm Farrell Hatch Oklahoma Pardon and Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by822 opinions
- Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Steffey v. OrmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Rachel v. TrouttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Toevs v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Warren Crozier v. Westside Community School DistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
817 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.