Legal Opinion

State v. McCabe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 1990No. 882189; CA A60587PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4); ORS 475.992(1). He argues that the court erred by denying his request for appointment of different counsel.1 We reverse.

Defendant was charged with possession and delivery of a controlled substance. Counsel was appointed for him, and he pled not guilty. Before trial, defendant wrote a letter asking the court to appoint different counsel. On February 17, 1989, the court held a hearing on defendant’s request, without his counsel being present. Only part of that hearing is reported, but the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. PaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Bargas-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. MakinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API