Legal Opinion

City of Niles v. Howard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1984No. 83-1151PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The city of Niles raises two issues in its appeal. First, the city argues that the drug laws of the state of Ohio are not general laws and, therefore, are outside the purview of Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution. Section 3, Article XVIII sets forth that:

“Municipalities shall have authority to exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits such local police, *164sanitary and other similar regulations, as are not in conflict with general laws. ” (Emphasis added.)

If the city were correct in asserting that the drug laws are not general laws,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. City of Eastlake v. Ohio Board of Building StandardsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Dayton v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BurnettOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Cincinnati v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. BurnettOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Automatic Refreshment Service, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API