Flonnory v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice,
for the Majority:
Defendant-below/Appellant Freddie Flonnory (“Flonnory”) appeals from a conviction in the Superior Court of felony Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (“DUI”), under 21 Del. C. § 4177(a) and (d)(3). Specifically, Flonnory challenges the Superior Court’s denial of his motion to suppress the results of a blood draw. Flonnory raises two claims on appeal. First, Flonnory contends that the trial court erred in holding that Delaware’s implied consent statute, 21 Del. C. § 2740(a), exempted the blood draw from the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. Second,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Flowers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- State v. ModlinNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Tennessee v. Chad E. HenryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.