Legal Opinion

Flonnory v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 28, 2015No. 156, 2014PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice,

for the Majority:

Defendant-below/Appellant Freddie Flonnory (“Flonnory”) appeals from a conviction in the Superior Court of felony Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (“DUI”), under 21 Del. C. § 4177(a) and (d)(3). Specifically, Flonnory challenges the Superior Court’s denial of his motion to suppress the results of a blood draw. Flonnory raises two claims on appeal. First, Flonnory contends that the trial court erred in holding that Delaware’s implied consent statute, 21 Del. C. § 2740(a), exempted the blood draw from the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. Second,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Flowers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  4. State v. ModlinNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State of Tennessee v. Chad E. HenryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API