Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Nash Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The defendant entered a demurrer ore tenus to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for that it affirmatively alleged contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

On a demurrer the statute (C. S., 535) requires that we construe the complaint liberally with a view to substantial justice between the parties. The demurrer admits the truth of all the material facts alleged, and every intendment is adopted in behalf of the pleader. A complaint cannot be overthrown by a demurrer unless it be wholly insufficient. If in any portion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elder v. Plaza RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Davis v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Burgin v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Hardy v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API