Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 19, 2019No. A163957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANDAU, S. J.

*265ORS 164.354 provides that, to prove the offense of second-degree criminal mischief, the state must offer evidence that a defendant engaged in conduct that "damages" the property of another. At issue in this case is what "damages" means. Defendant contends that it requires proof of economic loss to the owner of the property and, because there was no evidence of such economic loss in this case, the trial court should have granted a motion for a judgment of acquittal on that offense. The state argues that, because the statute requires proof of only harm to the property of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. W. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. SantiniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. SantiniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API