Legal Opinion

State v. Randall

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 13, 1977No. 1 CA-CR 2133PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Presiding Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court should have granted appellant’s motion to suppress the contents of three suitcases which were seized at Sky Harbor Airport and searched without a warrant after appellant’s arrest and detention.

Following denial of the motion to suppress, the matter was submitted to the trial court based upon the preliminary hearing transcript. Appellant was found guilty of attempted transportation of marijuana and ordered to pay a fine totaling $3,000 pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-1002.10. The underlying facts are not disputed and are taken…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. State v. FasslerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. OchoaArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. FannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald SchleisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. State v. EisemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. HeberlyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. State v. PetersArizona Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API