Legal Opinion
State v. Millan
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 8, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 94-0478PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress evidence and statements filed by Edison Millan (defendant). We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Defendant and a co-defendant, Zusana Singh (Singh), were each indicted on one count of transportation of marijuana for sale having a weight of more than two pounds, a class 2 felony, and one count of possession for sale of marijuana having a weight of more than four pounds, a class 2 felony. Singh was also indicted for possession of marijuana, a class 6 felony. Defendant filed a motion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. JuarezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
- State v. PetersArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.