Legal Opinion
Federal Life Ins. Co. v. Rascoe
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1926No. 4455PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Neither the opinion of the court nor the motion for new trial can be accepted as a separate finding of facts. Law v. U. S., 266 U. S. 494, 496, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; U. S. v. Gordin and U. S. v. Gordin, Adm’r, 9 F(2d) 394, decided by this court December 1, 1925.
Without such separate findings of facts, neither the evidence nor the question of law presented by it is reviewable by this court. If, however, the facts stated in the opinion and in the motion for a new trial were accepted as a finding of facts made by the court, to which exceptions were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Heay v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Joseph H. Beaman v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Kuhn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.