Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
Motions have been filed in both the above cases to strike out certain allegations of the petitions. The question presented by such motions is whether the plaintiffs are presently entitled to recover future installments in ease of disability benefits.
Both plaintiffs held disability insurance contracts. These provided for the payment of specified ^installments upon a showing of total disability. In each ease proofs of such disability were tendered, and in No. 8389 payments were actually made for a brief period, but in each case liability has been denied by the defendants.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. RascoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Bertha Merrick v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Wyll v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1933
- McCann v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.