Legal Opinion
Kuhn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 23, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
Defendants have moved the court for the following relief:(1) For an order pursuant to Rule 12 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.. following section 723c (a) dismissing the first and second causes of action against the defendant, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California ; (b) dismissing the second cause of action against the defendant, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company for failure to State a claim upon which relief can be granted;(2) For an order striking out the first cause of action, subdivision A, against the defendant, Pacific…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mobley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Killian v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Beaudoin v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. McAuleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Rosenfeld v. CITY PAPER COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- McCann v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.