Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1917No. 13544PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Sessions, J., entered January 22, 1916, granting a ■motion in arrest of judgment, after a trial and conviction of larceny.

1Opinion of the Court

Webster, J. —

Respondent was accused, and upon trial found guilty, of the crime of larceny by receiving stolen property. From an order granting a motion in arrest of judgment, the state appeals.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the state has no right of appeal from an order granting a motion in arrest. Rem. Code, § 1716, subd. 7, expressly confers upon the state the right to appeal from such order. The motion to dismiss will be denied.

It is contended that the information is fatally defective in that it fails to allege the name of the owner of the stolen property. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. DengelWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State v. DruxinmanWashington Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. RandallWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. EastonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. NeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API