Legal Opinion

State v. Druxinman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1904No. 4923PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King County, Bell, J., entered July 11, 1903, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of receiving stolen property.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

The defendant was convicted of buying, receiving, and aiding in the concealment of stolen goods, knowing the same to have been stolen. The following errors are assigned on appeal: (1) Error in overruling objection to the introduction of any evidence; (2) error in denying motion, at the close of the state’s case, to instruct the jury to acquit; (3) error in overruling challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, interposed at the close of the case, and denying motion for an instructed verdict of acquittal; (4) error in admitting certain testimony in rebuttal; (5) error in instructions given…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SalleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Jolly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. StaffordWashington Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API