Legal Opinion

State v. Randall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1919No. 15340PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered January 29, 1918, upon a trial and conviction of unlawfully driving an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The defendant was charged by complaint, before a justice of the peace, with unlawfully driving an automobile. From a judgment of conviction in that court, he appealed to the superior court, where the complaint was demurred to on the ground that it failed to state facts ‘ ‘ sufficient to charge this defendant with the commission of any criminal offense.” The demurrer was overruled, and the trial resulted in a judgment of conviction and a fine in the sum of $25 and costs. From this judgment, the appeal is prosecuted.

No statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been brought to this court.'…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. ColumbusWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. City of Seattle v. MolinWashington Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. CoppesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. State v. Nieblas-DuarteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. State v. KarsunkyWashington Supreme Court · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API